Protocol clarity. Connected supply. Accountable decisions.
Quality by design

Technical controls.
Operational responsibility.

Agilix implements controls relevant to electronic records and signatures. Their effectiveness must be assessed in the intended use, qualified deployment and organizational quality system.

Record integrity in context

Understand the control.
Understand its boundary.

21 CFR 11.10(e)

Audit trail

Recorded actions retain UTC time and actor/action context. A hash-chain verification workflow supports integrity review.

Boundary: a hash is not encryption, and chain verification does not prove event completeness or absolute protection from privileged storage changes.

21 CFR 11.10(d), (g)

Access and authority

Account, study, site, permission and blinding checks constrain operational access. Account administrator scope remains separate from system administration.

Boundary: approved provisioning, periodic review, timely deactivation and user training remain organizational responsibilities.

21 CFR 11.50, 11.70, 11.200

Electronic signatures

Supported signed actions request authentication and justification, retaining linkage to the affected workflow or document event.

Boundary: signature policies, identity verification and legal/accountability requirements must be established by the organization.

21 CFR 11.10(b), (c)

Copies and retention

Permission-scoped exports support review. Account document versions and archived bytes are retained; ordinary reporting exports are explicitly unsigned.

Boundary: define retention periods, archive accessibility, complete-copy requirements and backup/restore evidence for the actual records.

Evidence without overstatement

A foundation for review.
Not a certification claim.

Controlled requirements, design, test and traceability documents support the quality review. Developer tests are valuable evidence, but do not substitute for approved intended-use validation or independent acceptance.

Validation and change control

Approve intended-use requirements, risk assessments, acceptance protocols and deployment qualification. Assess study amendments and software changes before release under the quality system.

Timeouts and authentication

Review configured session behavior, failed-login controls and reauthentication against approved policies. Permission changes revoke affected sessions; browser behavior alone does not prove timeout enforcement.

Encryption and infrastructure

Validate TLS, database/volume protection, key persistence and encrypted backup controls in the target environment. Local HTTP and database inspection are development conveniences, not evidence of encryption in transit.

Regulatory references

Ground the assessment
in the intended use.

From understanding to action

A clear view of your next step.

Explore a workflow, understand its controls, and bring focused questions to your study team.